« RCM & the Sub-Prime Mortgage Meltdown | Main | Measuring Performance »

November 09, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jon McFadden

Hi Thomas,
What is missed by most readers of this article is that the problem was unknown by the author when he inspected the machine. A modal test was done first because that was the suspected culprit. Only when resonance was eliminated as the cause was other testing done. Since Dan had ME’scope available as a tool, it made perfect sense to continue using it to complete the diagnosis.
If you follow this link, a discussion has already been posted. In it, I made the comment that if you have a ratchet in you tool pouch, would you use it or a combination wrench.
http://maintenanceforums.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3751089011/m/2751001993

Thomas Reinhart

Wow,

All that effort to say what was inevitable, replace the unit. Its not like it was a defective unit from the get go. If it is vibrating rebuild it! Cause and effect! Sometimes one must rationalize to justify ones exsistence.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Sponsors

Reliabilityweb.com RSS Feed

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter